English-Only Rules in Florida
|
HR
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor
Laws |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Our company in Florida wants to establish English-only rules. Is this legal?
You have hit upon a hot topic that might change with each month. In fact, court cases are coming about all the time that debate the role of language restrictions in the workplace. Some people believe that language restrictions, such as English-only restrictions, are unconstitutional and that they also violate Title VII rights of all employees to an anti-discriminatory workplace. Other people believe that because English is the most widely-used language of the United States, it should be allowed that companies can require English-only restrictions.
Only recently, there was a case that went to court regarding the mandatory usage of English and Spanish in a fire department. The department determined that because so many of its neighbors were Hispanic, that firemen would have to be bilingual or they would not be able to help the Hispanic community. This particular case is just peeking its head into court now.
Back to your question about English-only rules. Basically, the court could rule either way at this point. While currently, the English-only restriction is not illegal, but if it is restrictive against all employees that are legal to work in your company, then it could be seen as discriminatory under the terms of Title VII. It is important that you are aware that under the terms of the Title VII document, it is illegal to discriminate against someone based on their national origin and characteristics associated with their natural origin, such as their accent and way of dressing.
First, in order to determine whether your company really needs the English-only restriction, it is important to understand why you might implement such a restriction. Is it really necessary to your business operations and success? You need to also understand how far-reaching this rule could be. Will it affect all employees and be restrictive in a way that could violate their comfort and freedom? What are the potential long-term effects of such a rule on every one in your company?
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, August 21st, 2007 at 11:28 pm and is filed under
Hiring and Staffing, Human Resources Management, Labor Laws.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (798)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1187)
- Employment Training (293)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1875)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Overtime
November 21st, 2008 -
Hurman Resource response from manager to employee changing lunch hour
November 21st, 2008 -
Employee Separation
November 21st, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 21st, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 21st, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it is exempt or non exempt?
November 21st, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008
Pages