Idaho Sex Discrimination and Height
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor
Laws |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Management/Leadership |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Workplace
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Idaho, can I set a minimum height requirement for hiring security guards? What is the difference between sexual harassment and a hostile working environment?
Let’s take your question about height first.
The answer is no, you cannot. Setting a 6-foot minimum eliminates most women and many people who are members of certain ethnic groups, ancestries, or national origins. That would put such a move in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits job discrimination based on color, national origin, sex, race, or religion. Any such practice or policy limiting job opportunities for a protective group is probably illegal. Not only does that include hiring, by the way, but also firing, transfer, training, and promotion, as well as working condition, benefits, and compensation.
You as employer would have to show that hiring someone 6 feet tall or more would meet a significant and justifiable business need. Such a scenario is unlikely, but if, for example, the operating controls on a bulldozer could only be reached by someone at least 6 feet tall, that might amount to a legitimate need.
Remember too that height as a requirement could easily be challenged if some other tests of job performance could be found. A test of strength or stamina, for example, would probably trump a height requirement as a true measure of the abilities of a security officer. That’s because it would not eliminate people by gender, race, ethnic group, and the like.
Now for your second question, the difference between sexual harassment and a hostile working environment.
We’ll explain some of the terminology. The creation of a hostile working environment is actually one specific form of sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment comes in two forms.
The first is unwelcome sexual advances. That could include sexual advances, obviously, but also requests for sexual relations and sexual types of verbal and physical contact. Quid pro quo harassment pressure when an employer seeks sexual favors from an employee in exchange for job advantages or to avoid firing or other bad outcomes.
The second form is the hostile work environment. That means being the target of sexual, and more specifically offensive or abusive, conduct because of gender.
This entry was posted
on Thursday, September 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pm and is filed under
Hiring and Staffing, Human Resources Management, Labor Laws, Management / Leadership Development, Workplace Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages