Human Resource Blog

Where HR Professionals Seek Answers

A Practical Source For Your Daily HR Needs.Lets Build An HR Blog Community Together! Want To Share Your HR Knowledge Or Gain Knowledge Through Other Professionals?Lets Discuss HR!

Sep28

Mississippi State vs. Federal Law

Compensation
Employee Payroll Action Form
W-4 Employee Withholding Allowance Cert.
Employee Payroll Status/Change Form
Direct Deposit Form
Total Compensation Summary
HR Management
Confidential Employee Folder
Confidential Employee Medical Folder
Job File Worksheet Folder
Daily EEO Applicant Flow Log
Workplace Information Sheets
Request to Inspect Personnel Files
Labor Laws
Complete State & Federal Labor Law Posters
1 Year Compliance Protection Plan
State ONLY Labor Law Posters
Federal Labor Law Posters
Workplace Management
Attendance Organizer for 2010 or 2011
Employee Warning Notice
Employee Counseling Report
Performance Improvement Plan
Employee Performance Evaluation Form
Employee Final Warning Notice
Separation Checklist
Harassment Prevention Kit

I’m confused on which takes precedence in

Mississippi, state or federal law. I know the state law applies sometimes, and not at others, but why?

Priority is given to the law that provides better benefits to the worker, regardless of whether that law is state or federal. This rule of thumb applies when both state and federal labor laws cover a worker. Typically, that happens when a business sells its products across state lines.

In some cases, for example, the federal minimum wage law will prevail over the state law if the federal minimum wage is greater. In cases where the state minimum wage law is more generous, then state law has preference.

Let’s say a Washington state business sells products across state lines. The

Washington minimum wage is $7.93 an hour. The federal law is $5.85 per hour. At this business, the workers would be entitled to the

Washington rate of $7.93 because it is more generous.

Kansas state minimum wage law guarantees only $2.65 an hour. A

Kansas business selling across state lines is bound by the federal minimum wage rate of $5.85 an hour because it is the better of the two.

Sometimes, for the same employer, federal law may apply in one case and state law in another. Take this example of family leave in Hawaii.

Hawaii’s own family leave law guarantees up to 4 weeks of unpaid leave to take care of a seriously ill relative, whether parent, child, or in-law. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides up to 12 weeks for family care. But the care of in-laws is not included in federal law.

So if a Hawaii employee needed time off to take care of an in-law, that worker would be covered by Hawaii law, and would receive up to 4 weeks of leave. That’s more generous than the federal law, which would provide no leave.

But if the same worker needed leave to care for a child or parent, federal law would prevail. Since both Hawaii and federal laws guarantee leave under those conditions, the one providing more time takes precedence. Federal law provides 12 weeks compared to

Hawaii’s 4, so federal law has priority. JH

This entry was posted on Friday, September 28th, 2007 at 10:01 am and is filed under
Compensation, Human Resources Management, Labor Laws, Workplace Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply





  • [ Back ]
  • Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Home Ask a Question Archives

© 2008 HumanResourceBlog.com, All Rights Reserved