South Dakota Age Discrimination
|
HR
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor
Laws |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
I’m a manager in South Dakota. I’m tired of immature employees, and want to hire only applicants who are over the age of 25. Is this age discrimination under any law?
You would be entirely within your rights to do so. No South Dakota or federal law says that hiring only workers over 25 would amount to age discrimination. Usually, it’s legal to offer preferential treatment to older workers, but illegal to offer it to younger workers.
Court cases uphold your right as an employer to give preferential treatment to older workers. Take the case of retirement plans. Employers may offer them only to workers over a certain age – 62 or 65, for example. On the other hand, courts have not supported the preferential treatment of younger workers. One judicial decision, for example, ruled that an early retirement buyout in the rail industry for workers aged 50 to 60 discriminated against workers beyond age 60. The plan had to be expanded to include workers over age 60. That was despite the fact that workers in that older age group qualified for a completely different pension package already.
The ADEA, or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, is the key legislation. It prohibits discrimination of workers 40 years old and beyond, whether in hiring, layoffs, training, pay, harassment, or other areas, for businesses with 15 or more employees.
There are some instances in which age has been found to be what is called a “bona fide occupational qualification.” For public safety reasons, it is legal to establish limits at either the bottom or top end of the age spectrum. Police departments may hire only those over 21, for example, and airlines may retire pilots at age 65.
The U.S. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 provides age discrimination protection to older workers in employment settings where federal funding is received. That might include nursing homes, hospitals, and other social services.
Although several states, notably including Kansas, extend the protection against age discrimination to anyone over 18, they are in the minority. And, South Dakota is not one of them. JH
This entry was posted
on Thursday, October 11th, 2007 at 9:55 am and is filed under
Hiring and Staffing, Human Resources Management, Labor Laws.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1011)
- Benefits (1493)
- Compensation (1583)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2718)
- Labor Laws (1096)
- Management / Leadership Development (338)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (553)
- Workplace Health & Safety (254)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Comp time for salaried employees
March 11th, 2010 -
Meal Break Requirements
March 11th, 2010 -
Employee who will not sign a W4 form
March 10th, 2010 -
Do you have a form that employees sign after reading the company policy
March 10th, 2010 -
Converting from Paper to Digital
March 9th, 2010 -
Texas.Employee access to restroom
March 8th, 2010 -
Discretion to work from home rather than file for fmla
March 6th, 2010
Pages