ADEA in Minnesota
|
Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Employment
Training |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How does the ADEA impact my Minnesota company?
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act impacts companies across the U.S., including companies in Minnesota. However, just because the Act affects companies across the country does not necessarily mean that all companies are affected by the Act.
Companies need to meet certain requirements in order to be covered by the ADEA. For example, a company needs to have at least 20 employees that work in the business of interstate commerce. Also, those 20 employees need to have been full-time employees with a company for at least 20 weeks out of the preceding year in order for the company to qualify for coverage under the Act.
Also, employment agencies in any state are covered by the Act. In addition to the employment agencies, all local, state and federal government agencies are covered.
When a company is covered by the ADEA, the company is prohibited from discriminating against potential employees and employees that are over the age of 40. The employer may not take age into a consideration when it does its hiring. Also, when the company looks to make promotions, terminations, or when the company looks at changing the benefits that it offers th employees, the company may not take age into consideration when making decisions. In short, whenever there is a decision to be made about personnel, age must not be a consideration.
Also, according to the ADEA, employers may require that employees retire after the age of 65. However, in order to legally mandate retirement, the employees need to have held a leadership and decision –making position within a company. The employees also need to receive at least $4,000 a month in retirement income.
If an employee is unable to perform the functions of a job as an indirect consequence of age, then the employer may terminate the employee or transfer the employee to another position. However, the employee will need to be able to prove that the decision was not based on the age of the employee. CB
This entry was posted
on Friday, November 16th, 2007 at 7:59 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Compensation, Employment Training, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages