Maryland Progressive Discipline
|
Employment
Training |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Maryland, what is progressive discipline?
Many employers and professionals in Human Resources are confused about progressive discipline. It’s often mistakenly thought of as peer-review, or co-worker administered discipline. That’s not quite accurate.
Any system in the work place that sets well-defined consequences for rule violations, which increase with each successive violation of that rule, is termed progressive discipline. The purpose of this system is not to punish, but to inform the employee exactly what behavior is acceptable at work, and to allow that worker an opportunity to improve work performance.
A system of progressive discipline in the workplace has several advantages. Both employees and supervisors have clear-cut rules and consequences of policy. When a policy is violated, the employee knows exactly what to expect and the supervisor isn’t faced with determining what the correct disciplinary action should be. It’s already spelled out for both of them.
Consider the following situation. An employee takes excessively long lunches, with no discernable excuse. The first time it happens, the worker is sent to training on the employer’s policies regarding break times. The second time the employee breaks the rule, a verbal warning is issued. Third and fourth times translate to written warnings. Fifth time, the worker is suspended for three days, and upon the sixth occurrence is terminated.
Each step of this progression is documented in writing, including training and verbal warnings. The documentation is a measure to ensure the practice is being applied fairly and equally among employees, and provides a written record of the worker’s “progress”.
The example above defined the violation as breaking the rule without a good excuse. There can be times when applying the consequences needs some flexibility. A woman who gets back late from lunch, because she had to pick up her sick child from school and find a babysitter, is not the same as a woman who took a long lunch because she lost track of time. JH
This entry was posted
on Sunday, November 25th, 2007 at 10:50 pm and is filed under
Employment Training, Performance Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (797)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1186)
- Employment Training (292)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1873)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Employee Separation
November 20th, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 20th, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 20th, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it\’s exempt or non exempt?
November 20th, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008 -
FMLA backdating guidelines in Las Vegas, Nevada
November 19th, 2008 -
Sick Pay
November 19th, 2008
Pages