FMLA Leave
|
Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello,
One of our employees had been on maternity leave (FMLA) this year. Is there any law prohibiting the employer to lay off the employee for one year? What are the policies for this issue?It’s not clear from the question if the employee is still on FMLA leave, or not. It is also unclear how long the worker has been on FMLA leave.
FMLA, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, permits workers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year. It generally applies to employers with 50 or more workers within 75 miles, and to employees who have worked 1,250 hours or more in the past 12 months.
FMLA covers a variety of situations, including the birth of a new baby.
Under FMLA, an employer must give the worker her job back, when she returns from leave. If the same job is not available, the employer must give the worker a job with the same benefits, pay, hours and working conditions. The worker must return after 12 weeks of leave, or face being terminated.
Employers must also maintain an employee’s group healthcare coverage during FMLA leave. In many (but not all) states, the employer can require that the worker pay her usual portion of the healthcare insurance premium.
It would absolutly be a violation of this federal law for an employer to fire or “lay off” a worker just because she was on FMLA leave.
When a worker returns from FMLA leave, she is entitled to seniority and benefits just as if she had never left. The only exception is, employers are allowed to take FMLA leave into account when giving “perfect attendance” awards.
A recent change to the FMLA called NDAA requires employers to give up to 26 weeks of unpaid, job protected leave to relatives of soldiers who are active military duty. This includes members of the National Guard and Reserve that have been deployed, or are about to be deployed.
An employer can lay off a worker who is on FMLA, but only if the employer is laying off other employees. Suppose an employer decides to lay off the entire tech support department, and outsource that function. If one of the tech support people was on FMLA leave, she could be laid off with the rest of her department.
However, any employment decision has to be made WITHOUT taking the employee’s status (FMLA leave) into consideration. For example, an employer who was laying off only 5 people could not decide, “Let’s lay off June, she’s on FMLA leave anyway.” That would be a violation of federal law.
If the employee in this question has returned from FMLA leave, than there is nothing to prevent the employer from laying her off…provided, again, that decision is unrelated to her FMLA status. If layoffs are done according to seniority, then the employer must count the time the employee was on FMLA as work time.
This entry was posted
on Friday, February 22nd, 2008 at 1:13 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Benefits.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
7 Responses to “FMLA Leave”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages
February 23rd, 2008 at 9:48 am
[…] One of our employees had been on maternity leave (FMLA) this year. Is there any law prohibiting the … By Caitlin It’s not clear from the question if the employee is still on FMLA leave, or not. It is also unclear how long the worker has been on FMLA leave. FMLA, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, permits workers to take up to 12 weeks of … […]
March 11th, 2009 at 2:47 am
Great post, thanks for the info
March 11th, 2009 at 8:34 am
Hi loans! You are more than welcome!~ Caitlin
March 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write in my site something like that.
March 20th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Hi John! Thanks! Caitlin
February 9th, 2010 at 11:28 pm
Thanx for all the excellent info!
February 10th, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Hi bridging! You are very welcome!~ Caitlin