Light Duty in Delaware
|
Management/Leadership |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is an employer obligated to put an employee on light duty in Delaware, if no appropriate work is available?
No Delaware or federal law requires creation of light duty work. Employers need only abide by laws regarding disabled workers and nondiscrimination. Employers are under no obligation to provide light duty assignments, if no suitable work exists.
Some employees believe that light duty restriction means they can do little or no work and still get a paycheck. That is not true. Employers who do not have enough light duty work to fill a 40 hour week need not create such a job.
Just what employers will do regarding light duty assignment will depend on past practice and current company policy.
Some companies, concerned that an injured worker will injure himself or herself further, have policies forbidding the creation of light duty assignments.
Some companies have policies allowing for light duty. When such a firm has sufficient work for 3 people but 4 people qualify for the light duty, the fourth will not be allowed to return to work until he or she can assume regular duties.
Some jobs lend themselves better to light duty modification than others. A secretarial position, for example, is largely desk work and can be readily adapted. On the other hand, a job requiring a warehouse worker to move 50-pound containers may not be easily modified. In that case the employer would probably be willing to create light duty secretarial jobs only.
Employers must insure that their light duty practices are fair, consistent, and nondiscriminatory.
If an employer were to create light duty work for Asian-American workers but not for African-American employees, that would be discriminatory. Violations of Title VII are enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or EEOC.
Under the ADA, “reasonable accommodation” would have to be made for a worker, provided a doctor has certified that the worker has a temporary or permanent disability, and that the worker has requested the accommodation. A stool to allow the worker to sit instead of standing would be reasonable. Creating a new job for the worker or hiring a second person to help would not be reasonable. JH
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 26th, 2008 at 11:27 am and is filed under
Hiring and Staffing, Management / Leadership Development.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (798)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1187)
- Employment Training (293)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1875)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Overtime
November 21st, 2008 -
Hurman Resource response from manager to employee changing lunch hour
November 21st, 2008 -
Employee Separation
November 21st, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 21st, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 21st, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it is exempt or non exempt?
November 21st, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008
Pages