Arizona FMLA
|
Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I posted this question the other day and my friend works in Arizona:
I have a friend that is currently pregnant. She has worked for this company for at least seven years. They are telling her that she must use FMLA for her doctor visits. She planned to ask for 12 weeks of FMLA when she has her baby. Now they are telling her she will not be eligible for the 12 weeks because she is using some of that time for her visits.
Now I want to know if it is legal for them to make her use her FMLA for her doctor appointments because she wants to use her sick time.
There’s good news and bad news here.
Your friend may be entitled to use her sick time for the doctor’s office visits, depending upon company policy. So she could be paid for that time. However, even if she is paid, it can still be deducted from her 12 total weeks of unpaid FMLA leave. This is true as long as the employer notifies her ahead of time in writing that such paid leave will be counted as FMLA leave.
It appears that the employer has already provided the worker with the required notification, which is why this question is arising.
This is largely a matter of company policy. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, which enforces FMLA, “The substitution of accrued sick or family leave is limited by the employer’s policies governing the use of such leave.”
Many, many employers permit workers to use all of their vacation, sick and person time, and then take an additional 12 weeks of unpaid leave under FMLA. However, there is no federal law that requires them to do so.
This employer has chosen the less generous option, of allowing the employee a total of 12 weeks of time off, period. This is perfectly legal, unless the employer has treated other workers with a serious health condition in a different way in the past.
If the employer has treated other workers with a serious health condition differently, then the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires that the employer do the same for pregnant workers. Suppose Bob had a heart attack. He was allowed to take 2 weeks of sick time, plus 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA. In that case, under PDA, the employer must treat Bob the same. However, if the employer counted Bob’s 2 weeks of sick time as part of his 12 total weeks of FMLA, then they can legitimately do the same for a pregnant employee.
To look at another example, suppose that Mary has cancer. The employer has permitted Mary to use her sick time for intermittent doctor’s appointments prior to taking FMLA leave. Under these circumstances, the employer must treat a pregnant employee the same way. However, if the employer required Mary to use FMLA leave for her intermittent doctor’s appointments, then it can legitimately do the same with a pregnant employee.
By definition, any period of incapacity due to pregnancy or for prenatal care qualifies as a “serious health condition” for FMLA purposes.
One way to think of FMLA is as a two-edge sword. On one hand, it guarantees employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for a serious health condition, or to bond with a newborn child. On the other hand, it caps the total amount of leave that an employer must grant in those situations at 12 weeks. That’s not 12 weeks, plus any sick or vacation time, but 12 weeks total.
This entry was posted
on Monday, March 17th, 2008 at 2:05 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Benefits.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
5 Responses to “Arizona FMLA”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages
March 19th, 2008 at 10:05 am
[…] Arizona FMLA By Caitlin … be entitled to use her sick time for the doctor’s office visits, depending upon company policy. So she could be paid for that time. However, even if she is paid, it can still be deducted from her 12 total weeks of unpaid FMLA leave. … […]
August 29th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
I have a friend that has worked for the same company for over 18 years. He has had a stroke and is partially paralized on his left side. The company he works for has filed Chapter 11 and only has about 20 to 30 employees left in the state. He asked about the FMLA for 90 days to complete his physical therepy but was told that since they have less than 50 employees in the state the company does not qualify to give him FMLA. Is this correct? He was told he could go on Cobra if he wanted to contiue his insurance cause they were dropping his medical coverage. Does he have any options at all?
September 2nd, 2009 at 8:03 am
Hi Le Burke! Unfortunately, your friend has few options in our society. The company is correct — they are too small to be covered by FMLA. If he were permanently disabled, he would qualify for Social Security, but there are few resources available to those who are on short term disability. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin
December 7th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I have an employee who is returning to work, after holding her position for 12 weeks, and has informed me that she will only work from Tuesday to Friday. That was not told to me as the employer, do I have the right to terminate her. She should be working Monday through Friday.
December 8th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
Hi Sylvia! If you mean that the employee has been on FMLA for 12 weeks, if she has a permanent disability under some circumstances you would be required to provide a reduced work week under ADA. Post a more detailed question (not comment) for a longer answer. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin