DUA and Laid-Off Employee in Mississippi
|
Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have had contact with a recent employee that we laid off in Mississippi. The employee had been receiving unemployment insurance. Recently, our company lost our office space in a flood and our workers are receiving DUA financial assistance. This laid-off employee wants to know if she qualifies for DUA assistance too. Does she?
No. The Disaster Unemployment Assistance program is a federal program that is in place to provide financial assistance to current employees and employees that have lost their jobs as a direct result of a disaster, such as a flood, fire, or storm. The program does not provide financial assistance to former employees that are receiving unemployment insurance from any state across the country, including Mississippi. However, if the employee had been currently employed at the time of the disaster or if the employee had a contract that was scheduled to begin again, the employee may have qualified for DUA help.
The DUA program is administered by the federal government. In order for employers and employees to receive financial assistance through the program, the disaster needs to be declared a federal disaster by the President of the United States. Often, natural disasters are the qualifying events that open up funding for DUA help. However, other types of disasters may qualify as well.
In order for employees to receive financial assistance through the program, the employee must not already be receiving unemployment insurance compensation. Employees could receive up to 29 months of assistance if they meet at least one of the following criteria:
· The employees should have been employed at the time of the disaster with the expectation that the employment would have continued had it not been for the disaster.
· The employees could also receive financial assistance if they had a contract to begin work, but had not yet started their first day of work because of the disaster.
· The employees should be unable to work as a direct result of the disaster. For example, the employees need to have been injured in the disaster and unable to work as a result of the injuries. Alternatively, if the place of work has been damaged or destroyed and the employees have not place to go to work, the employees may be able to receive compensation. CB
This entry was posted
on Friday, March 21st, 2008 at 11:24 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Compensation, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages