Title VII in Pennsylvania
|
Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HR
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have just received a complaint in Pennsylvania from a male nurse that believes that he has been denied a position in the neonatal intensive care unit because of his gender. Please confirm that such discrimination would be a violation of his Title VII rights.
You are correct; such discrimination would be a violation of an employee’s Title VII Rights. According to Title VII, employees should be treated equally and have the same opportunities in the workplace regardless of their age, race, gender, ethnicity, and national origin. Thus, it is illegal to discriminate against an employee for reasons that are based solely on one of these characteristics or that are associated with one of these characteristics.
Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against employees and job applicants for reasons that are based on covered characteristics (such as gender and race) during any employment-related period of decision making, such as hiring, promoting, terminating, training, and compensation.
When it comes to a situation in which a male nurse was denied a position for reasons that he believes are associated with his gender, the employee could have been discriminated against because of stereotypes. For example, the employee might believe that a hiring manager would not place a male in a position in which he would be required to care for infants because of some stereotypes that men could be less sensitive and nurturing than females. In such a situation, discrimination based on stereotypes could have occurred and such discrimination is also prohibited by Title VII.
Keep in mind, however, that employees need to qualify to earn certain positions within a workplace. Thus, simply because an employee is a member of a minority group does not mean that an employee will be entitled to a job, even when an employer uses affirmative action in his or her hiring and employment-related practices. Thus, employees need to have the proper backgrounds, skills, and recommendations in order to be placed fairly in a position.
However, the Act only applies to current employees of the employer and to job applicants of the employer. The Act does not extend coverage to customers and clients of the employer. Also, the Act does not prohibit employers from discriminating against employees for reasons that are not covered, such as a disability. CB
This entry was posted
on Friday, March 28th, 2008 at 2:40 pm and is filed under
Benefits, Compensation, Hiring and Staffing, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (798)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1187)
- Employment Training (293)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1875)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Overtime
November 21st, 2008 -
Hurman Resource response from manager to employee changing lunch hour
November 21st, 2008 -
Employee Separation
November 21st, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 21st, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 21st, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it is exempt or non exempt?
November 21st, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008
Pages