Second Doctor’s Note
|
Hiring
and Staffing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An employee’s manager wants an explanation of the “medical issue” that kept her out of work for a week after she already gave him a doctors note. Is this legal?
In some cases, employers have the right to request more medical information regarding an employee’s absence. However, that information does not necessarily include a diagnosis.
Unfortunately, too many employers have been burned by workers with a doctor’s note. An employee with the sniffles could take 2 weeks off work, and visit her doctor once in that period. The employee could return to work proudly waving her doctor’s note, assuming that the absence would be acceptable.
It’s reasonable for the employer to request that the worker produce a note from her doctor that states she needed to take a week off, under these circumstances.
However, in most cases, the employer cannot require that the worker share private medical information including a diagnosis. In most cases, even if the HR person learns of the employee’s medical condition, that information must be kept private – even from managers and supervisors – under HIPAA. The ADA also requires that medical information be kept confidential. For example, under HIPAA and the ADA, any medical information should be kept in a confidential file, separate from the employee’s personnel file.
In many cases, an employer can discipline or even fire a worker for taking too much time off, even if the employee has a doctor’s note.
A special situation exists if the employee is taking unpaid time off under FMLA, the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. FMLA permits workers to take time off when they have a “serious health condition.” Under FMLA, the employer may legally require that a healthcare professional (usually a doctor) certify that the employee has a “serious health condition” that requires time off work.
Most employers use this FMLA certification form supplied by the US Department of Labor, although it’s not required. Medical professionals are permitted to supply a diagnosis on the form, but they are not required to.
This entry was posted
on Friday, April 25th, 2008 at 12:43 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Hiring and Staffing.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages