Salary and Hourly on Same Paycheck
|
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have a promotion going on where some of our salaried personnel will be working 1 additional day per week outside of their normal job duties for extra pay - “Piece Work” totaling $84.00 per day. Should this be entered in as a separate paycheck or should it be included with their regular salaried paycheck?
This is an interesting situation. Apparently, the company is short of hourly workers and is offering salaried supervisors the opportunity to pick up extra cash by working a shift on their day off.
The best way to handle this might be to pay salaried workers who volunteer to work an hourly shift on their day off a “bonus” of $84, on their regular check. The salaried worker is being rewarded for initiative and superior performance, not paid for additional hours.
To answer your question, it is fine to put both amounts on the same paycheck. Combining the two doesn’t alter the legality of this payment process. In fact, putting the “piece work” and salaried amounts on separate checks may be interpreted by the US Department of Labor as an attempt to commit fraud by avoiding overtime payments – which is the real issue here.
Your title refers to paying “hourly” and “salaried” wages to the same employee. That’s a problem, whether it’s on one paycheck or two. Once you start paying a salaried worker at an hourly rate, they usually lose the salaried-exempt status. This is true, even if the salaried worker is doing labor normally accomplished by an hourly worker. In that case, the employer becomes liable for back pay for any overtime the employee has worked in the past few years. The back pay would also apply to others in similar positions, even if they never volunteered for an extra hourly shift.
For this reason, many employers would not solve the labor shortage by paying salaried workers to pull hourly shifts. They would schedule hourly workers for overtime, or hire additional workers.
Legally, the employer could require salaried managers to fill in, without additional payment. Ironically, the employer is creating more legal problems by trying to do the right thing.
Before you implement this policy, we would suggest that you check with the state and federal Labor Departments, or with an attorney. It may be perfectly legal if the payment is a bonus, but if not, it could potentially cost the company thousands of dollars.
This entry was posted
on Monday, May 19th, 2008 at 9:46 am and is filed under
Compensation.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “Salary and Hourly on Same Paycheck”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (830)
- Benefits (1264)
- Compensation (1247)
- Employment Training (295)
- Hiring and Staffing (727)
- Human Resources Management (2057)
- Labor Laws (1041)
- Management / Leadership Development (302)
- Performance Management (182)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (439)
- Workplace Health & Safety (226)
- Workplace Management (397)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Company Trucks and Gas Cards
January 8th, 2009 -
State of Georgia Maternity Leave Forms
January 8th, 2009 -
Hourly vs. Salaried non-exempt
January 8th, 2009 -
Doctors note/certification
January 8th, 2009 -
Benefits for Florida employees
January 8th, 2009 -
Exempt/non-exempt
January 8th, 2009 -
Maternity leave in Missouri, Small Employer
January 7th, 2009
Pages
June 12th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
Could you confirm that this amendment was passed in Arizona (Section 1. Title 23, chapter 2, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 23-204):
A. AN EMPLOYER SHALL ALLOW EACH EMPLOYEE TO TAKE AT LEAST ONE THIRTY MINUTE MEAL BREAK DURING EVERY CONTINUOUS EIGHT HOURS OF LABOR PERFORMED.
B. AN EMPLOYER SHALL ALLOW EACH EMPLOYEE TO TAKE AT LEAST ONE TEN MINUTE REST PERIOD DURING EVERY FOUR HOURS OF LABOR PERFORMED. THE EMPLOYER SHALL NOT DEDUCT ANY WAGES FROM THE EMPLOYEE FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME THAT THE EMPLOYEE IS PARTICIPATING IN A REST PERIOD.
July 8th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Hi Sandi! No, we can’t confirm that. The complete AZ Statute 23 on Labor Law for 2008 is here: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp?Title=23
It does not show that any such law was added. I suspect that the bill was passed on one chamber of the legislature, but not the other. Both the Arizona Industrial Commission of Arizona and the US Department of Labor confirm that there is currently no break law in Arizona for employees over the age of 18.