Overtime on salary, being let go
|
Compensation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hi, I am on salary but my job requires overtime. I have never been paid overtime but my employer excepts me to work. Six months ago he was going to sell the co & I worked more than 120 hrs OT & did not get paid. Plus not one salaried employee has any record of the hours worked. Plus I do have a slight disability (ADD) which does hinder my job. Been with this co for 5 yrs. I have requested for over 2 yrs for my office not be a break area (5 or 6 desks) but the owner does nothing about it. It is very loud most of the time. So at any given time there could be 6 or 7 people in there talking playing music, playing musical instruments. ETC. He just always says I am b—ing about it. I am the bookkeeper dealing with figures all the time. Now he is thinking of laying off 6 people and hiring others at lower salaries. The girl that would replace me doesn’t have the requirements for this job. but the owner says he needs to cut back. Plus my age now is 60. I do think he is discriminating against me. A month or so ago I was the best employee he ever had and now he wants to replace me. Is this illegal?
Nothing you have mentioned sounds like illegal discrimination. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act or ADA, employers have to make reasonable accommodations for disabled workers. However, the EEOC guidelines for “disability” are pretty severe. Your ADA probably does not qualify under the law, unless ir prevents you from carrying out normal daily activities like taking a bath, grocery shopping or using a phone book. So that’s not an issue.
Administrative employees including bookkeepers who earn more than $455 per week are often exempt from overtime. For a specific ruling on whether or not you are entitled to overtime, you should contact the US Department of Labor.
Employers are perfectly free to fire their staff and replace them with workers who earn less. It may very well be that the business will suffer as a result, but that’s the owner’s concern, not the EEOC’s. If the employer was talking of firing you specifically because of your age, and hiring a younger worker at the same salary to do the same work, that would be illegal discrimination. However, in this case, the employer has a legitimate reason to lay off the higher-paid workers. He needs to save money, and hiring less experienced workers is one way to do that. The employer should keep an accurate record of hours worked by each employee. As a bookkeeper, it might be wise for you to suggest it. It would be interesting to know what type of company it is, that people play musical instruments at work.
This entry was posted
on Monday, June 9th, 2008 at 8:52 am and is filed under
Compensation.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (797)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1187)
- Employment Training (293)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1874)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Hurman Resource response from manager to employee changing lunch hour
November 21st, 2008 -
Employee Separation
November 21st, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 21st, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 21st, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it is exempt or non exempt?
November 21st, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008 -
FMLA backdating guidelines in Las Vegas, Nevada
November 19th, 2008
Pages