FMLA Rolling Calendar
I have a question regarding the rolling calculation method. We have an employee who used 6 weeks of FMLA from 6/8/07 to 7/23/07, then used 4 weeks from 5/2/08 to 6/1/08, and now is requesting 2 weeks from 6/1/08 to 6/16/08. Based on the rolling calculation method, is she eligible for 1 week from 6/1/08 to 6/8/08, and then a whole 12 weeks beginning from 6/8/08?
Just to review, there are 4 permissible ways to calculate FMLA, as you probably know. FMLA can be counted on the calendar year. It can also be calculated beginning on a fixed date, such as the beginning of the fiscal year or the employee’s annivarsary date. The most common method is a 12-month period from the first day that the employee uses FMLA leave. (Using this method, the employee would indeed be entitled to an additional 12 weeks of FMLA beginning 6/8/08.)
The final method of calculation is the one your company uses, the rolling year. Under this method, eligibility is calculated backwards beginning on the date the employee uses leave. In your example above, an employee who requested FMLA leave on 6/8/08 would only be entitled to 1 week of FMLA leave. That’s because, counting backwards from 6/8/08 to 6/8/07, the employee has already used 11 weeks of FMLA. If the employee took that week, on 7/24/08 she would be entitled to an additional 6 weeks of FMLA leave. On 6/2/08 she would be entitled to an additional 4 weeks of FMLA leave.
For more about calculating FMLA leave, see http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/fmla/faq.asp
This entry was posted
on Thursday, June 26th, 2008 at 8:09 am and is filed under
Attendance Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “FMLA Rolling Calendar”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (797)
- Benefits (1209)
- Compensation (1186)
- Employment Training (293)
- Hiring and Staffing (715)
- Human Resources Management (1874)
- Labor Laws (1031)
- Management / Leadership Development (292)
- Performance Management (177)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (419)
- Workplace Health & Safety (218)
- Workplace Management (392)
Blogroll
Archives
Recent Posts
-
Hurman Resource response from manager to employee changing lunch hour
November 21st, 2008 -
Employee Separation
November 21st, 2008 -
Maternity leave
November 21st, 2008 -
What comes next…after you terminate an employee?
November 21st, 2008 -
When can you implement a salary cap on a position whether it is exempt or non exempt?
November 21st, 2008 -
What is COBRA and who gets it?
November 20th, 2008 -
FMLA backdating guidelines in Las Vegas, Nevada
November 19th, 2008
Pages
September 29th, 2008 at 9:55 am
I requested 6 weeks of FMLA. I received a letter from my employer stating my 6 weeks of FMLA had expired, and if I do not return to work by that date, I would be terminated. I am entitled to 12 weeks under FMLA, should the later state the end of the 12 weeks, instead of the 6 weeks requested.
September 29th, 2008 at 10:24 am
Hi Cassie! Yes and no. You are entitled to a total of 12 weeks of FMLA. However, if a particular illness or serious health condition only lasts 6 weeks, then that is all you can take. Generally an employee’s doctor certifies the employee’s serious health condition for a specific period of time. In your case, it appears to be 6 weeks. After that time ends, the employer can legitimately expect the employee to return to work.
The bottom line is that you requested 6 weeks of FMLA,and now that 6 weeks is up. If you wish to take additional FMLA time, and you still have a serious health condition (or another qualifying reason) then you’ll need to complete the paperwork for additional FMLA. This may include having a doctor re-certify your serious health condition. Ideally, this would be done before your current period of FMLA ends. If not, it might be wiser to return to work for a few days (if possible) rather than be terminated for taking unapproved leave. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin