Human Resource Blog

Where HR Professionals Seek Answers

A Practical Source For Your Daily HR Needs.Lets Build An HR Blog Community Together! Want To Share Your HR Knowledge Or Gain Knowledge Through Other Professionals?Lets Discuss HR!

Jul17

Short Term Disability and Pregnancy

Benefits
Total Compensation Summary
Performance Improvement Plan
Performance Appraisal and Review
Employee Payroll Status/Change Form
Employee Change Form
HR Management
Confidential Employee Folder
Confidential Employee Medical Folder
Job File Worksheet Folder
Daily EEO Applicant Flow Log
Workplace Information Sheets
Request to Inspect Personnel Files

Is it a law that you need to be consistent with employees?

One of our employees is going out for cancer treatment and another is going out for maternity leave. Under our certificate of coverage for STD, maternity is covered as any other illness. Our STD pays 60% of your pay up to $500 a week. We are making up the pay difference for the employee going out for cancer treatment through a payroll check- but not for the woman going out for maternity leave. Is this legal?

There is no law that an employer must be consistent with employees. However, there is a law that the employer must provide the same benefits, including paid disability leave, as they do to other employees who are on short term disability. This is under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, or PDA. Most women with a normal delivery are on disability for 4 to 8 weeks. For that period, you must provide the same benefits, including payments, as you do to other employees with a physical disability. The pregnant employee will likely take additional time (up to 12 weeks total) for baby bonding under FMLA or a similar state law. You are not under an obligation to pay her for that time, if you do not pay other employees who take time off under FMLA to care for loved ones.

Also note that the pregnant employee must receive the same benefits as other employees on short term disability. If you permit employees on STD for cancer or a heart attack to use their vacation time, you must permit the pregnant worker to do so, as well. The PDA is enforced by the EEOC. If you continue to pay the employer\\\\\\\’s portion of the health insurance premium for the worker with cancer, you must also pay it for the pregnant worker. Not doing so is pregnancy discrimination.

This would be true, even if you currently had no other employees on STD. Any benefits that have been provided to disabled workers in the past, must apply to pregnant workers.

Read more about pregnancy discrimination from the EEOC: http://www.eeoc.gov/types/pregnancy.html

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 17th, 2008 at 10:49 am and is filed under
Benefits, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Short Term Disability and Pregnancy”

  1. James Taylor Says:

    Can a woman be fired for letting her boss know that she is pregnant? I’m not sure how this type of situation is handled.

  2. Caitlin Says:

    Hi James! Check out the archives for the article on “Laid Off and Pregnant.” I think you’ll find it informative. And thanks for your comments! Caitlin

Leave a Reply





  • [ Back ]
Home Ask a Question Archives

© 2008 HumanResourceBlog.com, All Rights Reserved