<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FMLA Leave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/</link>
	<description>Where HR Professionals Seek Answers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/#comment-14467</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/?p=3605#comment-14467</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave! Thanks for bringing up an important point! Collective bargaining agreements change many situations in the workplace. ~ Caitlin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave! Thanks for bringing up an important point! Collective bargaining agreements change many situations in the workplace. ~ Caitlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/#comment-14462</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/?p=3605#comment-14462</guid>
		<description>This may not be the case if the employee is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may not be the case if the employee is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/?p=3605#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>Hi Denny! Yes, the employer can designate this time off as FMLA. This choice is not up to the employee, it is up to the employer. 
The employer can also require that the employee complete FMLA certification paperwork, and terminate the employee for excessive absenteeism if the employer does not comply. 
However, even if the employee does not complete FMLA paperwork, the employer can designate this time off as FMLA. Under the federal FMLA, an employee is entitled to 12 weeks of medical leave. There is no requirement under federal law that an employee be given 12 weeks of unpaid leave plus their 3 weeks of sick leave. The maximum is 12 weeks, even if a portion of that time is paid. 
As long as the employer informs the worker at the beginning of leave that it is being counted as FMLA, that is lawful. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denny! Yes, the employer can designate this time off as FMLA. This choice is not up to the employee, it is up to the employer.<br />
The employer can also require that the employee complete FMLA certification paperwork, and terminate the employee for excessive absenteeism if the employer does not comply.<br />
However, even if the employee does not complete FMLA paperwork, the employer can designate this time off as FMLA. Under the federal FMLA, an employee is entitled to 12 weeks of medical leave. There is no requirement under federal law that an employee be given 12 weeks of unpaid leave plus their 3 weeks of sick leave. The maximum is 12 weeks, even if a portion of that time is paid.<br />
As long as the employer informs the worker at the beginning of leave that it is being counted as FMLA, that is lawful. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/#comment-14154</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/?p=3605#comment-14154</guid>
		<description>What if the employee had 3 weeks of sick leave instead of vacation leave? Example; an employee requires a week off to recover from an illness and chooses not to declare the leave as FMLA, they have adequate sick leave accumulated to cover the required time off. Can their company / agency force them to assign this as FMLA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the employee had 3 weeks of sick leave instead of vacation leave? Example; an employee requires a week off to recover from an illness and chooses not to declare the leave as FMLA, they have adequate sick leave accumulated to cover the required time off. Can their company / agency force them to assign this as FMLA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update Nov 26</title>
		<link>http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2008/11/26/fmla-leave/#comment-11779</link>
		<dc:creator>FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law : FMLA Law News Update Nov 26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/?p=3605#comment-11779</guid>
		<description>[...] FMLA Leave By Caitlin The employers action in putting the employee on FMLA was 100% legal and even very compassionate. Employees who are on short term disability are normally also on FMLA at the same time. FMLA provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid, &#8230; Human Resource Blog - http://www.humanresourceblog.com/  Relief in Sight? DOL Issues Final FMLA Regulations. By elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information&#8230; More than 15 years after the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was signed into law, the US Department of Labor (DOL) chose to evaluate and revise regulations that it had promulgated in 1995 during President Clinton&#8217;s Administration. &#8230; Federal Employment Law Articles - http://www.elinfonet.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] FMLA Leave By Caitlin The employers action in putting the employee on FMLA was 100% legal and even very compassionate. Employees who are on short term disability are normally also on FMLA at the same time. FMLA provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid, &#8230; Human Resource Blog - <a href="http://www.humanresourceblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanresourceblog.com/</a>  Relief in Sight? DOL Issues Final FMLA Regulations. By <a href="mailto:elin@elinfonet.com">elin@elinfonet.com</a> (Employment Law Information&#8230; More than 15 years after the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was signed into law, the US Department of Labor (DOL) chose to evaluate and revise regulations that it had promulgated in 1995 during President Clinton&#8217;s Administration. &#8230; Federal Employment Law Articles - <a href="http://www.elinfonet.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.elinfonet.com/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

