Back-dating FMLA without treatment by a medical provider
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An employee’s last day at work was 10/10/08. She was first treated by a medical provider on 11/15/08. On 12/23/08, FMLA paperwork was completed stating she became unable to work beginning 10/11/08. The employee remains out of work to date. Is it appropriate for the employer to certify her FMLA beginning 10/11/08?
This is a grey area, and may very well require a lawsuit to resolve. At a minimum, we would like to see an official opinion by the U.S. Department of Labor, which enforces the FMLA or federal Family and Medical Leave Act. We certainly cannot answer your question without a lot more detail than this forum permits.
The U.S. Department of Labor introduced updated FMLA regulations on January 16, 2009. However, it appears that this situation would be covered under the old regulations.
This question speaks to the definition of a serious health condition under FMLA. Some conditions, especially pregnancy, are always considered a serious health condition. However, for other conditions, the FMLA regulations require that the employee either a) be unable to work for a few days AND require at least one appointment with a health-care provider or b) Require treatment by a health care provider at least 2 or 3 times. It is not clear whether this employee meets those guidelines or not. Could an employee claim FMLA if they were out of work for 3 months and did not see a healthcare provider until the last day? It would probably take the Supreme Court to decide.
However, we can probably save you some trouble. If the employee went on 12 weeks of FMLA leave on 10/10/08, she would be due back at work on 1/2/09. If the employee did not report to work that day,(or on her next scheduled day if 1/2/09 was a non-work day) she can be terminated for taking more time off than FMLA permits. (If your company calculates FMLA by the calendar year for all employees, you may have to return the employee to her job. But that is very, very unusual.)
Either way, please contact the U.S. Department of Labor to ascertain if this employee is even entitled to FMLA leave, and which regulations will apply. And thanks for a really interesting question!
Tags: doctor, FMLA, leave, return
This entry was posted
on Monday, February 2nd, 2009 at 4:14 pm and is filed under
Attendance Management, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
7 Responses to “Back-dating FMLA without treatment by a medical provider”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1091)
- Benefits (1583)
- Compensation (1729)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (837)
- Human Resources Management (2889)
- Labor Laws (1110)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (210)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (581)
- Workplace Health & Safety (275)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Employee bathroom usage on non-shift hours
September 2nd, 2010 -
Pregnant Employee
September 1st, 2010 -
Time Clock Punches
August 31st, 2010 -
Part Time Lunch Break Law
August 30th, 2010 -
Termination pay in Texas
August 25th, 2010 -
New business current employees!
August 23rd, 2010 -
Entitled to Unemployment with Offered Relocation?
August 20th, 2010
Pages
February 2nd, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Mom Blogs - Blogs for Moms…
…
February 4th, 2009 at 5:40 am
[…] ยป Back-dating FMLA without treatment by a medical provider Human … By Caitlin On 12/23/08, FMLA paperwork was completed stating she became unable to work beginning 10/11/08. The employee remains out of work to date. Is it appropriate for the employer to certify her FMLA beginning 10/11/08? … Human Resource Blog - http://www.humanresourceblog.com/ […]
March 3rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm
I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!
April 5th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
Important info related to the actual prostate usually involved me. Most of the message, » Back-dating FMLA without treatment by a medical provider Human Resource Blog, works to make a number of actually insightful as well as wel informed observations. I will let my own close friends fully understand with reference to this report as well simply because it talks about a little of the feelings I now have felt for a stretch of time.
April 8th, 2010 at 9:52 am
Hi Huey! Thanks for your insights!~ Caitlin
May 5th, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Just wanted to say I enjoyed the blog. You have really put a lot of energy into your content and it is just great!
May 5th, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Check back often, tommy! We post 5 days per week!~ Caitlin