Salaried employees during a reduction in hours
|
Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As a result of a budget cut, I am in the beginnings of the process to prevent a reduction in force. I have cut hours of both full-time and part-time hourly employees. My question is: Can I cut hours/salary from exempt salaried employees? I haven’t thought so, since salaried employees are paid the same, no matter the number of hours worked, right? Any other ideas?
Many, many employers are in this position. There are two basic suggestions to avoid laying off employees. You can reduce exempt employees salaries, or you can implement week-long furloughs.
You are correct that under the federal FLSA or Fair Labor Standards Act, an exempt employee who is ready, willing and able to work the entire week must be paid his or her full weekly salary — even if they work fewer hours or days. So cutting hours for exempt employees will not result in any payroll savings.
However, an exempt employee who performs no work at all during the entire payroll week need not be paid for that week. This is true, even if the furlough is at the employers request (or demand.) Many, many companies are requiring that exempt employees take one, two or three weeks of unpaid furlough each quarter, as an alternative to laying people off. Employees are not permitted to use vacation time during their furlough, because that does not save payroll expenses.
The second alternative is to implement a permanent reduction in exempt salaries. Ideally, this reduction will affect all salaried employees, or an entire group of employees (such as all salespeople.) Employers can implement salary reductions unilaterally. In order to be considered permanent, the salary reduction must be in effect for at least 3 months. The best practice in HR is to inform employees at least one full pay period in advance, that their salary will be reduced. Preferably, there would be no reduction in hours to accompany the reduction in salary.
In some cases, the courts have upheld a permanent reduction in hours for exempt employees that is accompanied by a reduction in salary. But, the employees salary cannot fluctuate depending upon the number of hours worked — then they become a non-exempt employee.
Many companies are also implementing a freeze on vacation time or PTO, whereby employees can take approved time off, but it must be unpaid.
For more detail, check out the articles on exempt salary reducations on blog.laborlawcenter.com.
Tags: exempt, reduction, salary
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 at 9:45 am and is filed under
Compensation.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages