locking the bathroom in NJ
|
Labor
Laws |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some of the employees at our company in New Jersey are requesting that a lock be put on the ladies restroom door. There are 2 stalls, however, one of our employees are breastfeeding and the other is diabetic. Is it discrimination to have a lock on the main bathroom door?
No, but it may create more problems than it solves, if this is your only restroom for women.
Almost all public restrooms for either sex have deadbolts on the main door for security reasons. This is true of bathrooms in most restaurants, libraries and office buildings. The thought process is that if a person is being attacked, he or she can run to the nearest restroom and deadbolt it. While this does not guarantee safety, it at least buys some time while the person calls the police on his or her cell phone. It would certainly not be discrimination if you put deadbolts on the main doors of both the mens and womens restrooms. These deadbolts are almost never used.
However, as an employer you also have a legal obligation under OSHA to provide employees with restrooms, and the opportunity to use them when nature calls, within reason. The deadbolt may be an issue if locking it means that other employees do not have access to a bathroom for extended periods of time. This may not be a problem when the diabetic locks the door, because it probably takes her 5 minutes or less to use her insulin. However, if the breastfeeding mother locks the bathroom door for 20 minutes to express milk, that will mean that female employees do not have access to a bathroom during that period. Unless you have another bathroom available, that could be a problem.
One solution would be to permit the brestfeeding mother to use a private office, break room or other area with a lock, to pump breast milk. In fact, many states require that employers provide such a space for breastfeeding mothers, although New Jersey does not, yet.
Tags: brestfeeding, employee, mother
This entry was posted
on Thursday, March 12th, 2009 at 7:40 am and is filed under
Labor Laws.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1091)
- Benefits (1583)
- Compensation (1729)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (837)
- Human Resources Management (2889)
- Labor Laws (1110)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (210)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (581)
- Workplace Health & Safety (275)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Employee bathroom usage on non-shift hours
September 2nd, 2010 -
Pregnant Employee
September 1st, 2010 -
Time Clock Punches
August 31st, 2010 -
Part Time Lunch Break Law
August 30th, 2010 -
Termination pay in Texas
August 25th, 2010 -
New business current employees!
August 23rd, 2010 -
Entitled to Unemployment with Offered Relocation?
August 20th, 2010
Pages