maternity leave
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When an employee returns from maternity leave, do they need to be offered their same position, (as in someone who was an assistant manager, can we hire them back at a lesser position)?
thank you,
RoseWell, that depends. If the employee took up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave under FMLA, the federal Family and Medical Leave Act or a similar state family leave law, then the employee must be returned to her previous job. If that is impossible, then she must be returned to a job with the same wages, hours, benefits and working conditions. In your example, that would mean that the employee would be returned to her job as assistant manager at the same store. If that store had closed, then she would be returned to a job as assistant manager at the same salary, at a different store.
An employer cannot take any negative job action against an employee because she uses FMLA. However, the employer can take any action that would have been taken anyway, if the employee was not on FMLA. Suppose that while this employee was on leave, the position of assistant manger was eliminated at all the stores. The assistant managers were demoted to sales associates. When the employee returns, she can be demoted to sales associate, also. However, if there are still assistant managers at the stores, the employee cannot be demoted simply because the employer hired someone else to fill in for her, while she was on FMLA.
However, your question raises another issue. It refers to hiring the employee back and maternity leave, which suggests to us that the employee was not on FMLA leave. It suggests that the employee was actually terminated, and was no longer employed by your company (perhaps because she was not covered under FMLA or because she took more than the 12 weeks under FMLA.) If this is true, then the employees job was not protected. You could rehire her as a sales associate, or a janitor for that matter. Or, you could refuse to hire her at all. That is strictly between you and the employee — you are under no obligation to return her to her previous position.
This answer would be different if it occured in one of the dozen or so states that have stricter family leave laws.
Tags: employee, family leave, maternity leave, rehire
This entry was posted
on Thursday, March 12th, 2009 at 7:42 am and is filed under
Attendance Management, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
5 Responses to “maternity leave”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1091)
- Benefits (1583)
- Compensation (1729)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (837)
- Human Resources Management (2889)
- Labor Laws (1110)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (210)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (581)
- Workplace Health & Safety (275)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Employee bathroom usage on non-shift hours
September 2nd, 2010 -
Pregnant Employee
September 1st, 2010 -
Time Clock Punches
August 31st, 2010 -
Part Time Lunch Break Law
August 30th, 2010 -
Termination pay in Texas
August 25th, 2010 -
New business current employees!
August 23rd, 2010 -
Entitled to Unemployment with Offered Relocation?
August 20th, 2010
Pages
March 13th, 2009 at 8:55 am
[…] ยป maternity leave Human Resource Blog By Caitlin It refers to hiring the employee back and maternity leave, which suggests to us that the employee was not on FMLA leave. It suggests that the employee was actually terminated, and was no longer employed by your company (perhaps because … Human Resource Blog - http://www.humanresourceblog.com/ […]
June 10th, 2009 at 5:35 am
I would think it would be unfair for someone to leave and comeback to lesser job, since that person didn’t do anything out of the usual. If you don’t want any maternity leaves just hire man, then.
June 10th, 2009 at 8:29 am
Hi Maltada dil egitimi! Not hiring women because they might take maternity leave at some point in the future would be illegal discrimination based on sex, in the US. We suffer from the quaint notion that women should have the same rights as men.
New fathers, as well as new mothers, are entitled to up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave under FMLA. After the leave ends, the employee must be returned to his or her original job. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin
July 1st, 2009 at 6:06 am
MM.. I see Caitlin. It is different in my country but I think yours is much better..
July 1st, 2009 at 8:09 am
Hi Maltada! Yes, employment vary a great deal from country to country. Within the US, there is a lot of variation from state to state. But thanks for your comments!~ Caitlin