Piercings, Tattoos, Jewelry
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Management/Leadership |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The general manager wants to add to the “personal appearance” policy:
No visible tattoos
No visible body piercing (other than ears)
No excessive jewelryThere are current employees who would be in violation of this “policy.”
I know legally we can set our own dress codes, but I am concerned that this may cause a problem because these employees were hired irrespective of visible tattoos and visible piercings.
What do you think?
No, this is really not an issue. As an employer, you have the right to change policies — including the dress code or personal appearance policy — at any time. There is no law that the employer must object to the employees appearance during the interview, or keep silent forever afterward. The employer can decide at any point that tattoos or excessive piercings are a problem, and take action at that time. As long as this policy is enforced uniformly against all employees, it is not discrimination and is not problematic.
Put very simply, any companys policies are subject to change, and the employees must adapt to the changes.
You should issue the new policy in writing, preferably giving employees advance notice of a week or two. You should also counsel existing employees with visible tattoos on covering them while at work. For example, an employee with a tattoo on her neck might be advised to wear a turtleneck under her uniform top. An employee with a tattoo on his hand might be encouraged to wear gloves, if practical. Small tatoos can be covered with a band-aid while at work. Although tattoos are becoming more accepted, individuals with visible tattoos should already be aware that those adornments limit their employment opportunities.
Employees with pierced body parts have the option of not wearing the jewelry at work. For example, an employee with a pierced tounge or nose could simply leave out the stud while at work. If an employee has a pierced navel, wearing clothing that covers the stomach should conceal it. As an employer, it is really not your concern what ink or hardware the employee is hiding under his or her clothes — what is visible, is your concern.
Tags: body piercing, dress code, personal appearance, tatoo
This entry was posted
on Friday, April 10th, 2009 at 3:15 pm and is filed under
Human Resources Management, Management / Leadership Development.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
One Response to “Piercings, Tattoos, Jewelry”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2723)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (338)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (255)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010 -
Electronic compliance poster
March 17th, 2010 -
Comp time for salaried employees
March 11th, 2010 -
Meal Break Requirements
March 11th, 2010
Pages
November 28th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
I dont usually reply to posts but in this case. WOW!