Short Term Disability and FMLA
|
Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HR
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your answer to a previous question was “Not every employee on Short Term Disability or STD is on FMLA, either. In order for STD or medical leave to count as FMLA, the employer must inform the employee at the beginning of leave, that it is FMLA. The employer cannot do that retroactively. If the employer fails to inform the employee in advance, the employee could be entitled to 12 weeks of paid STD plus 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA.”
We have an employee on paid short term disability. The doctor has recently extended it to June 3rd. Today, the employee inquired about FMLA. Per your comment above — we, the company, did not inform the employee in advance that it is FMLA. (We only provided the forms for STD.) Are we obligated to allow the employee STD benefits and FMLA concurrently at this time? In short, is the employee entitled to both based on these events.
Yes, this employee is currently eligible for 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave under FMLA, in addition to the (paid) short term disability leave that your company has already granted. It is your choice whether the takes both STD and FMLA concurrently beginning now, or whether the employee takes all the STD available and then begins their unpaid, job-protected leave under FMLA.
To put it simply, even if a company offers paid short term disability to employees, that does not change the companys obligation, under federal law, to offer up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA.
The way most employers handle this, of course, is for the short term disability or STD to run concurrnetly — at the same time — as the FMLA leave. However, under FMLA regulations, the employer must inform the workers at the beginning of leave, that it is being counted as FMLA. (It is very common for time off under workers comp to be counted as FMLA leave, as well.) If them employer fails to do this, the employee is entitled to 12 weeks of FMLA leave in addition to short term disability.
By the way — the employees doctor determines if he or she still has a short term disability, and whether or not the employee is able to return to work. However, the doctor does not determine whether or not the employee receives short term disability payments. The employer determines that. Most employers do not pay short term disability benefits. If you do, you should have a clear policy in place that states how long an employee is eligible for short term disability benefits. Often this is a maximum of 4, 6 or 12 weeks.
Since you are now extending the employees short term disability leave, by all means, notify the employee that he or she is also on FMLA. However, you cannot retroactively classify the leave already taken as FMLA.
Permitting this employee to take STD and then take FMLA also sets a precedent. If you do not treat other employees the same, you may well be the target of a discrimination suit. This is especially true if the next employee taking STD is of a different sex, race, color, religion or national ancestry from the current employee on STD. We would recommend that you immediately issue a written policy that employees on STD will be on FMLA concurrently, rather than taking one and then taking the other.
Tags: concurrent, employee, FMLA, short term disability, STD
This entry was posted
on Monday, April 20th, 2009 at 10:51 am and is filed under
Benefits, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
5 Responses to “Short Term Disability and FMLA”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1011)
- Benefits (1492)
- Compensation (1583)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2718)
- Labor Laws (1096)
- Management / Leadership Development (338)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (552)
- Workplace Health & Safety (254)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Comp time for salaried employees
March 11th, 2010 -
Meal Break Requirements
March 11th, 2010 -
Employee who will not sign a W4 form
March 10th, 2010 -
Do you have a form that employees sign after reading the company policy
March 10th, 2010 -
Converting from Paper to Digital
March 9th, 2010 -
Texas.Employee access to restroom
March 8th, 2010 -
Discretion to work from home rather than file for fmla
March 6th, 2010
Pages
April 21st, 2009 at 9:17 am
[…] » Short Term Disability and FMLA Human Resource Blog By Caitlin Your answer to a previous question was “Not every employee on Short Term Disability or STD is on FMLA, either. In order for STD or medical leave to count as FMLA, the employer must inform the employee at the beginning of leave, … Human Resource Blog - http://www.humanresourceblog.com/ […]
May 29th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Would this same principle apply if an employer failed to respond to an employee’s request for FMLA information, after going on prescribed medical leave? That is, if the employer did not inform the employee of FMLA (despite employee’s request for the information)can the employer after-the-fact and without prior notification, apply the 12 weeks of FMLA to paid leave that has already been used by the employee?
In this situation the employee made at least 3 requests for information, while on leave (using paid personal time off and sick leave). After the employee’s paid leave was depleted (10 weeks after the employee went on leave), the employer informed the employee that the FMLA was conditionally granted from the day their leave began. Only 10 weeks, after the fact did the employer provide the FMLA Eligibility Notice to the employee and request the Certification of Health Care Provider form to the employee to have their provider complete within 15 days.
May 30th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Hi tr! No. In most cases, when an employer counts other types of paid or unpaid leave as FMLA, the employee must be notified in writing, at the beginning of the leave, that it is being counted as FMLA. In this case, it appears to us that the employee is entitled to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected FMLA in addition to the 10 weeeks of paid leave.
The employee could and should put a start date on the FMLA form that does not include the 10 weeks of paid leave. If the employer does not agree, the employee should contact the U.S. Department of Labor regarding their rights in this situation.
Under the 2009 FMLA regulations, the employer must inform the employee of FMLA rights within 5 days of the first absence. It appears that the employer did not do so in this case. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~Caitlin
January 9th, 2010 at 5:50 am
Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!
January 9th, 2010 at 5:59 am
Thanks Katherine!~ Caitlin