Grooming Issues with Plumbers
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have one young man who has had 3 distinct haircuts in the last 6 months. First it was hippie long & shaggy, then shaved GI style and now a mohawk. He is the brunt of jokes on the jobsite (which he does not mind) and his fellow employees are tired of hearing them from the other contractors. He is a plumber so dress code is really lax, but the hair thing is causing problems and projecting a company image we do not like. Can we make adress code to limit hairstyles? We thought this might be too discriminatory.
Yes, you can implement a dress code and as long as you enforce it fairly and consistently, it is not discriminatory.
If you feel that this young man is not projecting the company image that you like, that is a valid concern. Requiring him to change his hairstyle because other contractors make fun of it is probably not a valid concern. (Our guess is that they will continue to make fun of him for some other reason.) And, we have to wonder…was his haircut *normal* when you hired him? Or were you hoping it would get better?
Traditionally, one of the perks of working construction has been the very lax dress and grooming code. People with hair like Willie Nelson and tatoos like Mike Tyson could work in construction, when they were excluded from other jobs. However, there is no law that this must be so. And perhaps you are not in a traditional construction setting.
You can establish a comprehensive dress and grooming code for all employees. Our suggestion is that you draft a dress code that covers all the bases while you are at it, including piercings, tatoos, jewelry, clothes, etc. etc. Many, perhaps most employers prohibit *extreme hairstyles.* In this case, an extreme hairstyle is whatever you say it is (as long as you are fair and consistent.) Mohawks would definitely qualify. Issue a written memo a week or two in advance to inform everyone of the new dress and grooming code.
You may have to follow up by taking this young man — or anyone else who violates the dress code — aside for a private conversation. Be tactful, but explain that his hair is a violation of the dress code. If he is very young, it may never have occurred to him that this is a valid job performance issue.
It is legal to have different dress and grooming codes for men and women in the workplace. The reality is that men and women dress differently in our culture, and the courts realize this. So you can prohibit men from having shoulder-length hair, but permit it for a female plumber, should you have one on the payroll.
If you issued a dress code and only required workers of one race, color, religion, or ethnic group to follow it, that would be illegal discrimination. But it is perfectly legal to discriminate between employees with mohawks, and employees without them.
Tags: dress code, employee, mohawk, plumber
This entry was posted
on Thursday, May 28th, 2009 at 8:24 am and is filed under
Human Resources Management, Workplace Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages