Non-exempt Salary Reduction
|
Compensation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our company took over an internal service force from an organization which wanted to outsource the work to us. As part of the deal we agreed to bring on a percentage of the current personnel for one year and the company would supplement the payroll for us to keep these key personnel around to assure knowledge base transfer went smoothly. At the end of the year the supplemental pay would cease and we would be able to change the personnel’s pay structure to match the requirements of the job of which similarly paid personnel would receive doing the same work. We reviewed these personnel and have changed their salaries without the supplemental wages from the customer based on the job requirements of other personnel in our company. Do we have any legal concerns if these personnel are all non-exempt and we applied the changes fairly across the board?
There are no special concerns regarding this change, but in the post-Ledbetter era, every salary change and especially every salary reduction should be carefully documented. The Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, of course, extended by decades the time frame that employees have to claim illegal discrimination based on wages.
There could be a concern about illegal discrimination if most or all of the affected personnel fell into a protected group. If all of the affected employees were female, while much of your (unaffected) workforce was male, that might be a concern. Or it might be a concern if many of the affected employees were African American, while the unaffected workers were Caucasian (or vice versa.) This could result in charges of illegal discrimination based on sex or race. And even though those claims would be unfounded, it can be expensive to defend against them.
However, keeping detailed records of why the salaries were reduced should prevent any suit from being filed. These records should be in each employees personnel file, as well as in a separate file detailing all the payroll reductions and the reasons behind them. For each affected employee, you will want to identify specific employees within your organization who perform similar jobs, and their salaries to show that the new, lower wage is fair.
It is also helpful to discuss this information to the affected employees, explaining how you arrived at this decision.
Tags: employee, exempt, ledbetter, non-exempt, salary reduction
This entry was posted
on Friday, July 3rd, 2009 at 11:23 am and is filed under
Compensation, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages