What is a good personnel policy regarding body art and piercing?
|
HR
Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What’s a good personnel policy regarding body art and piercing?
This depends upon the employer and the nature of the business.
Many employers take a rather conservative approach and prohibit visible body art, particularly in more traditional businesses like banking, or in customer service industries like hospitality. If your company opts for a policy like this, an employee who had a tattoo on his forearm would be required to wear long sleeves. An employee who had teardrops under his eyes, or other facial tattoos would be terminated, since there is no reasonable way to cover them at work.
Other employers permit visible tattoos, as long as they do not depict offensive or illegal activities. Many people would find a tattoo of a naked woman offensive, and many customers might hesitate to do business with you, if your employee has a marijuana leaf prominently displayed on his hand.
Sample wording: *Visible body art or tattoos are prohibited. All body art must be covered by normal clothing or uniforms while at work.* OR, *Visible body art or tattoos that are offensive or depict illegal activities are prohibited. The employer is the sole judge of what constitutes unacceptable tattoos.*
With piercings, it is not usually the piercing that is an issue — it is the jewelry worn in the piercing. For example, you may hire an employee with a pierced tongue but require that she remove the jewelry while she is at work. This is a perfectly reasonable requirement. Many employers limit earrings to one or two per employee. Some employers permit women but not men to wear earrings at work and require that they wear two or none but not one.
It is perfectly legal to have different standards of appearance for men and women. The courts have repeatedly ruled that it simply conforms to the norms in our society, that men and women frequently dress differently.
Sample wording: *Extreme jewelry is not permitted* (You do not have to say so, but note that in this wording, the employer alone determines what is and is not *extreme.*) OR *Jewelry is limited to a watch, wedding ring, and religious medal or symbol for men. Women may wear a watch, wedding and or engagement rings, single pendant, and small to moderate earrings.*
Also note that an employer can change the dress and appearance standards at any time. So even if an employee had the tattoos or a stud in a pierced tongue when interviewed and hired, the employer can decide that it is unacceptable at any time.
Be aware that for certain women of Hindu or Indian heritage, having a pierced nostril may be a reasonable accommodation for her religion. However, the employer does not have to permit the pierced nostril for women of other national ancestry and religions.
Tags: body art, discrimination, national ancestry, nostril, piercing, religion, tattoo
This entry was posted
on Monday, July 6th, 2009 at 11:36 pm and is filed under
Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
6 Responses to “What is a good personnel policy regarding body art and piercing?”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1011)
- Benefits (1493)
- Compensation (1583)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2718)
- Labor Laws (1096)
- Management / Leadership Development (338)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (553)
- Workplace Health & Safety (254)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Comp time for salaried employees
March 11th, 2010 -
Meal Break Requirements
March 11th, 2010 -
Employee who will not sign a W4 form
March 10th, 2010 -
Do you have a form that employees sign after reading the company policy
March 10th, 2010 -
Converting from Paper to Digital
March 9th, 2010 -
Texas.Employee access to restroom
March 8th, 2010 -
Discretion to work from home rather than file for fmla
March 6th, 2010
Pages
December 29th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post
December 29th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
You are very welcome, Andrew!~ Caitlin
January 24th, 2010 at 11:24 pm
Effortlessly, the post is definitely the best on this deserving topic. I concur with your conclusions and caneagerly look forward to your future updates. Expressing thanks will not be good enough, for the phenomenal clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates. Great work and much success!
January 25th, 2010 at 9:45 am
Thanks, Samantha!~ Caitlin
February 15th, 2010 at 6:30 am
That is nice to definitely find a site where the blogger knows what they are talking about.
February 15th, 2010 at 12:26 pm
thanks videofilmowanie!~ Caitlin