Exempt Employee Time and a half pay
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor
Laws |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have some employees who are exempt but when they work on the weekend we pay them time and a half. During the week they work about 50 hours and recieve a salary. I work in the construction industry so at times these weekend hours are mandatory. The corporate office is questioning our plan. Some other business units pay straight time for their exempt level employees who work on the weekends. So, who is right? Is this a violation of the FLSA?
Yes, this is a violation of the FLSA (the federal Fair Labor Standards Act) and neither plan that you suggest is legal if these workers are employees. (If they are genuinely independent contractors rather than employees, then either arrangement is legal.)
Under the FLSA, an employee is either exempt or non-exempt, depending upon his or her primary work duties. Exempt employees can be Executives, Administrators, Outside Sales, Professionals (like doctors and lawyers) or Computer Pros. Anyone who performs manual labor like carpentry or plumbing is a non-exempt employee.
It is important to note that there is no such thing as exempt duties, or exempt time. The employee is either exempt for every hour he works, or he is non-exempt for every hour he works. Suppose you have an exempt supervisor who fills in as a plumber on weekends. He is either exempt or non-exempt, based on his primary duties. If he is exempt, he is not entitled to additional pay over and above his salary when he works more than 40 hours per week. If he is non-exempt, he is entitled to overtime when he works more than 40 hours in the payroll week, regardless of his duties during those hours. There is no middle ground of *somewhat exempt* or *partially hourly*.
When you treat an exempt employee as if he were hourly, he automatically becomes a non-exempt employee permanently, regardless of his primary duties. In particular, if an employees pay varies from week to week based upon the number of hours worked, he is a non-exempt employee. So by paying these employees straight time or overtime when they work on weekends, you have made all of them non-exempt employees. They are all entitled to overtime when they work more than 40 hours in the payroll week. If one of them files a complaint, the US Department of Labor will require you to pay them overtime for the past 2 to 3 years.
In addition, by varying the amount the employees are paid each week, it appears you are conspiring to break the federal overtime law. The US DOL has a history of levying fines and penalties — up to 3x the total back wages — against companies that do this.
An exempt employee is entitled to his or her salary each week, regardless of the number of hours the employee works. If the employee works 20 hours, generally he is entitled to the same salary as if he works 80 hours. It does not matter if the hours worked are on the weekend or not. A number of federal cases have shown that even if the exempt employee works in a different capacity on the weekends (such as a restaurant assistant manager working as a waiter on Saturday and Sunday) if the employee receives additional pay, he becomes non-exempt for all hours worked for that employer.
Tags: employee, exempt, non-exempt, overtime, pay, salary, straight time, time and a half
This entry was posted
on Monday, December 14th, 2009 at 12:37 pm and is filed under
Human Resources Management, Labor Laws.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “Exempt Employee Time and a half pay”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1013)
- Benefits (1495)
- Compensation (1584)
- Employment Training (308)
- Hiring and Staffing (800)
- Human Resources Management (2726)
- Labor Laws (1097)
- Management / Leadership Development (339)
- Performance Management (207)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (554)
- Workplace Health & Safety (256)
- Workplace Management (424)
Blogroll
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
How many hours must be accrued to be eligible
March 18th, 2010 -
fmla for child
March 18th, 2010 -
HR confidentiality
March 18th, 2010 -
smoke breaks
March 17th, 2010 -
Payment of vacation and sick leave upon employee quitting
March 17th, 2010 -
PTO Plan — Discriminatory?
March 17th, 2010 -
Personnel Files
March 17th, 2010
Pages
December 16th, 2009 at 10:43 am
I had investigated this same issue for my employer in the past. Based on the information I found, I disagree with your response.
39CFR541.604 - Minimum guarantee plus extras
This Section states that an employer may provide an exempt employee with additional compensation without losing the exemption or violating the salary basis requirement, if the employment arrangement also includes a guarantee of at least the minimum weekly-required amount paid on a salary basis. It further states that such additional compensation may be paid on any basis (e.g., flat sum, bonus payment, straight-time hourly amount, time and one-half or any other basis.
So, if in your example of the Maintenance Supervisor, the employee is paid a weekly set salary regardless of how many hours worked, and the employee also works as a plumber on the weekends, the time could be paid as hourly or any other way the company decides.
This all depends on the strength of the exemption status of the primary position.
December 16th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
Hi Kara! You make an excellent point! Some employers get around this by calling the extra payment a bonus. However, making the “bonus” an hourly wage, at overtime no less, is a gray area. If the employee files a wage complaint, at the very least, the employer will spend thousands of dollars in legal fees to win the case. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin