Human Resource Blog

Where HR Professionals Seek Answers

A Practical Source For Your Daily HR Needs.Lets Build An HR Blog Community Together! Want To Share Your HR Knowledge Or Gain Knowledge Through Other Professionals?Lets Discuss HR!

Dec15

Maintaining Full Time Status

Benefits
Total Compensation Summary
Performance Improvement Plan
Performance Appraisal and Review
Employee Payroll Status/Change Form
Employee Change Form
HR Management
Confidential Employee Folder
Confidential Employee Medical Folder
Job File Worksheet Folder
Daily EEO Applicant Flow Log
Workplace Information Sheets
Request to Inspect Personnel Files

Our company currently defines full time status as working 36+ hours for field employees and 40+ hours for administrative employees. If an employe fails to maintain those hours for even 1 week, can they be forced into part time status?  This is in California.

Thanks!

Full-time or part-time status is a matter of company policy, not employment law, even in California.

The best practice in HR is to average the number of hours that the employee works over a period of 3 months or more, to determine full-time or part-time status. In your example, a field employee who averaged 35 hours per week for 3 months would be a part-time employee. A field employee who  averaged 37 hours per week over 3 months would be a full-time employee. However, there is no law that requires your company to determine full-time or part-time status in this way.

As an employer, you certainly can establish a policy that any field employee who works less than 36 hours, even for one week, is a part-time employee. This is a very strict policy, but if you have problems with one or more employees not working the expected hours, that would be one way to address it. Another way to address the problem would simply be to terminate the employee. In this economy, you should have no problem finding a qualified replacement who is willing to work the necessary hours. We will note that in California it can be more problematic to terminate an employee than in other states, so changing the employees status makes more sense.  

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under
Benefits, Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply





  • [ Back ]
  • Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Home Ask a Question Archives

© 2008 HumanResourceBlog.com, All Rights Reserved