FMLA and Reapplying
|
HR
Management |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hi, I am a first time manager, sometimes HR who needs information!
I have 2 questions: First our company is currently under 50 employees and has been for several months. I understand that a company must be under 50 for a year to be exempt from FMLA. Do we need to notify anyone that we are under 50 or after a year can we just not offer FMLA? 2) Also, our ownership is being restructured and they are considering asking everyone to reapply for the jobs they have now. Are there any legalities to this? Would any employee not rehired then be eligible for unemployment? Thanks so much for any information!We are very happy to help you with all your HR questions!
1) There is no one that you need to inform, when your number of employees drops below 50. You can simply stop offering FMLA after a year. However, be aware that it is not 50 full-time employees. Even part-time employees count towards the 50 total.
2) Many companies require that every employee reapply for their job when the company changes hands. The primary legal issue is that usual hiring restricitons apply, because employers who choose this route are very often the targets of lawsuits for illegal discrimination. You are limited in the questions that you can ask employees in rehire interviews, and the information that you can consider in this decision. (Suppose you know that Emily had breast cancer 4 years ago, or that Johns wife has had a stroke and requires a lot of care or that Cindy is pregnant, or trying to get pregnant. That information cannot be a factor in your decision to rehire these employees. Considering that information is illegal discrimination under federal law.) You should document the objective job-related reasons that you choose to rehire certain employees over others, such as eduction, skills or experience.
Any employees who are not rehired have essentailly be laid off and are entitled to unemployment benefits. However, any employees laid off during this process are likely to qualify for unemployment anyway, whether they were asked to reapply or not.
The primary benefit in having employees reapply for their jobs is that it sends a clear message to employees that the company is under new ownership, and policies — and perhaps performance standards — will change.
Tags: employee, FMLA, owner, reapply
This entry was posted
on Monday, February 15th, 2010 at 3:34 pm and is filed under
Human Resources Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “FMLA and Reapplying”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages
February 21st, 2010 at 10:49 am
Excellent answer. The questions you can and cannot ask in a job interview are universal and having employed the person you are re-interviewing you already know the answers to these illegal questions. This makes it difficult not to re-hire anyone who has a medical issue.
February 21st, 2010 at 2:35 pm
Hi Rich! We agree, although there are some questions that would be legal in one state and illegal in another — such as “do you smoke?* But we agree that in this situation, the employer better have objective evidence to support the selection process. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin