Returning to work from maternity leave
|
Termination |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We are a non-profit employer in New York. An employee has returned to work after 8 weeks on maternity leave. Prior to her notifying us that she was pregnant, we were going to lay her off. We have now had to wait through her pregnancy and leave as she was protected by disability laws. Now that she has returned, how long does and employer need to wait until we may legally lay of this employee?
Actually, you could have laid this employee off while she was pregnant. Under both federal and New York discrimination laws, an employer cannot lay an employee off because she is pregnant. However, the employer can take any action against a pregnant employee that would have been taken anyway, if the employee were not pregnant.
Nevertheless, if this is the only employee affected by the lay off, your decision to wait was wise. When a group of employees is laid off, it is easier to demonstrate that no discrimination took place.
You do not need to wait any particular period of time to lay off this employee. If you would like to wait 2 weeks or a month, that would be wise. But as long as you can demonstrate a business necessity for the layoff (and you are not simply hiring a replacement) this is a legitimate action to take.
Tags: employee, lay off, maternity leave, New York, pregnancy
This entry was posted
on Friday, February 19th, 2010 at 12:23 pm and is filed under
Termination.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “Returning to work from maternity leave”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages
February 25th, 2010 at 11:48 am
But we would want to hire a replacement. How does this change your answer?
February 25th, 2010 at 5:29 pm
Hi Eliz! If this is a performance problem, you should go through the usual documentation procedures to avoid the appearance of illegal discrimination. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin