limited duty not offered to workers comp employee
|
Workplace
Health & Safety |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I would like to find out what you do with an employee that is out on workers comp and was told they can do limited duty. But, you do not have any limited duty to offer. A position was offered to the employee but at a lesser rate. But, it is a position the employee can do in his medical condition.
This employee has refused the althernate position.
Any advice?
Thank you.
Ah, but you did offer limited duty to this employee — and she refused it.
We can only speak in general terms because any employer with an open workers comp case needs to be talking to his or her workers comp insurance company, or to an attorney specializing in employment law.
When an employee is on light duty, also called limited duty, the employer is not required to invent a job, if none exists. Some occupations adapt well to limited duty, and others do not. If you have another job that the employee is qualified to do, that meets the restrictions of limited duty, then you can offer that job to the employee. If the job is at a lower rate, then the employee is paid the ususal wages for that job.
In many cases, an employee on workers comp who refuses to return to work on limited duty is no longer eligible for workers comp. You should contact your insurance carrier or an attorney, but it may be that if the employee refuses to return to work, she can be terminated.
Tags: light duty, limited duty, refuse, workers comp
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010 at 8:53 am and is filed under
Workplace Health & Safety.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
3 Responses to “limited duty not offered to workers comp employee”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1077)
- Benefits (1570)
- Compensation (1698)
- Employment Training (311)
- Hiring and Staffing (830)
- Human Resources Management (2864)
- Labor Laws (1108)
- Management / Leadership Development (342)
- Performance Management (208)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (575)
- Workplace Health & Safety (271)
- Workplace Management (426)
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
Cigarette Smoking Workplace
July 31st, 2010 -
Caring for Legally Blind Spouse
July 30th, 2010 -
FMLA vs STD
July 28th, 2010 -
Joining 1st break with lunch break
July 27th, 2010 -
definition of “extended leave”
July 26th, 2010 -
vacation time remaining
July 26th, 2010 -
working more than scheduled
July 26th, 2010
Pages
February 25th, 2010 at 11:13 am
Is this true in every state? If so, would that employee potentially be eligible for a partial payment from the WC Carrier?
February 25th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Hi Michelle! This is true in every state. An employee on WC who has refused light duty has refused to return to work. If the employee accepts light duty, in some states s/he would qualify for a partial payment. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin
March 3rd, 2010 at 12:29 pm
[…] » limited duty not offered to workers comp employee Human Resource … […]