http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/ Where HR Professionals Seek Answers Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15216 The Facts About Internet Merchant Accounts (Mark Woodcock) « vici blog | Banks Finance Wisdom Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:29:56 +0000 http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15216 [...] » limited duty not offered to workers comp employee Human Resource … [...] […] » limited duty not offered to workers comp employee Human Resource … […]

]]> http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15180 Caitlin Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:31:04 +0000 http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15180 Hi Michelle! This is true in every state. An employee on WC who has refused light duty has refused to return to work. If the employee accepts light duty, in some states s/he would qualify for a partial payment. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin Hi Michelle! This is true in every state. An employee on WC who has refused light duty has refused to return to work. If the employee accepts light duty, in some states s/he would qualify for a partial payment. HTH, and thanks for reading the blogs!~ Caitlin

]]> http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15175 Michelle Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:13:24 +0000 http://www.humanresourceblog.com/2010/02/23/limited-duty-not-offered-to-workers-comp-employee/#comment-15175 Is this true in every state? If so, would that employee potentially be eligible for a partial payment from the WC Carrier? Is this true in every state? If so, would that employee potentially be eligible for a partial payment from the WC Carrier?

]]>