FMLA
Employee is on FMLA and just found out they are working during this at a different company, do I have to keep them on FMLA we are a very small company and this has been a hardship. The job she is doing is the same job duties her FMLA says she can not do?
This would appear to be a violation of FMLA, and as an employer you could fight it. If the employee were taking FMLA to care for a family member, that would be different. But taking FMLA because she cannot perform certain duties, while performing those duties at another job, is very suspicious.
However, it can be expensive and time consuming to challenge FMLA, so we will suggest another tactic first. You mention that you are a small company. The federal FMLA applies only to companies with 50 or more workers within 75 miles. You would be within your rights to inform this employee that effective next Monday, your company no longer offers an FMLA-type leave.
If you are granting unpaid leave under a state law, that would change the answer.
Tags: famly leave, FMLA, paid, time off, unpaid, working
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, April 14th, 2010 at 7:18 am and is filed under
Attendance Management.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
3 Responses to “FMLA”
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1435)
- Benefits (2003)
- Compensation (2322)
- Employment Training (329)
- Hiring and Staffing (1017)
- Human Resources Management (4191)
- Labor Laws (1552)
- Management / Leadership Development (357)
- Performance Management (244)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (744)
- Workplace Health & Safety (345)
- Workplace Management (498)
Blogroll
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
salary employees
May 16th, 2012 -
FMLA Notification Days Allowed
May 16th, 2012 -
Transition from PT to FT vacation accrual
May 16th, 2012 -
california family rights act
May 15th, 2012 -
Maternity leave
May 15th, 2012 -
Travel Time pay for Madantory Training
May 15th, 2012 -
FMLA FOR GRANDPARENT
May 15th, 2012
Pages
April 14th, 2010 at 12:11 pm
This is not necessarily true. There was an FMLA case that was settled last year stating that an employee that was on FMLA as a nurse at one hospital but doing the same services at another hospital was not in violation of FMLA because the environment in which she was working in was different then the FMLA restrictions.
April 14th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Hi Reanette! You bring up a good point! However, we are taking the original posters word for it that the job duties the employee is engaging in on the part-time job are exactly the ones that have been prohibited on the full-time job. Thanks for reading the blog!~ Caitlin
April 15th, 2010 at 8:23 am
[…] FMLA Human Resource Blog By Caitlin Employee is on FMLA and just found out they are working during this at a different […]