Maternity Leave Policy at small company
|
Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I work for a small company (16 people) in Massachusetts where FMLA does not apply. Our employee manual contains a maternity leave policy that provides for 8 weeks paid time off and 4 weeks unpaid time off. We recently had a woman out on maternity leave and she was given a total of 16 weeks off due to her own special circumstances. In the future, can all employees expect to be allowed 16 weeks off (as was the case recently)? Or can this be determined on a case by case basis? Thank you.
It is generous of your company to provide paid maternity leave. Yes, you have set a precedent by allowing this employee to take 16 weeks of leave. To be honest, it would have been better if you did not make a special exception for this employee, or if you had terminated her and rehired her when she returned to work. By granting this leave you have changed company policy and opened the door to discrimination suits.
If you deny 16 weeks of leave to the next pregnant employee, that will be illegal discrimination based on religion, race, color, national ancestry, etc. (For example, if the first employee was Catholic and the second employee is not, that is illegal discrimination based on religion.) Keep in mind that policies that create different benefits or working conditions for people in different groups are illegal discrimination, even if it was not your intention to discriminate.
To fix this situation, you need to establish or clarify a new policy, preferably in writing. The new policy may be the same as the old policy, or it could be different: *Employees are entitled to time off for pregnancy disability and childbirth disability, plus an additional 4 weeks of unpaid time off.* Or *Employees are entitled to 8 weeks of paid time off and 4 weeks of unpaid time off. An additional 4 weeks of unpaid time off may be granted by management if staffing needs permit.*
Simply saying that leave will be determined on a case by case basis is certain to create favoritism and resentment. It also invites a discrimination lawsuit when one person is granted leave and another is denied it. Some companies do this, and get away with it for a long time before a lawsuit is filed, so this is a judgment call.
Under federal law, you must grant the same benefits to an employee on pregnancy disability or childbirth disability, as you grant for an employee on medical leave for any other reason. If you permit an employee to take 12 weeks of unpaid leave for a heart attack, you must permit a pregnant employee on doctor-ordered bed rest to also take 12 weeks of unpaid leave.
Of course, the federal FMLA will apply once you have 50 or more employees within 75 miles.
Be sure you are familiar with the MMLA, although it sounds like your policy is more generous than what is required under that law: http://www.mass.gov/mcad/maternity1.html
Tags: 16 weeks, additional, discrimination, FMLA, maternity leave, medical leave, MMLA, paid, unpaid
This entry was posted
on Friday, July 30th, 2010 at 10:33 am and is filed under
Benefits.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
-
Ask a Question
Categories
- Attendance Management (1445)
- Benefits (2020)
- Compensation (2335)
- Employment Training (329)
- Hiring and Staffing (1017)
- Human Resources Management (4698)
- Labor Laws (1582)
- Management / Leadership Development (357)
- Performance Management (246)
- Structural Development (41)
- Termination (744)
- Workplace Health & Safety (346)
- Workplace Management (500)
Blogroll
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Recent Posts
-
overtime hours!!!
April 21st, 2013 -
Pregnancy
April 21st, 2013 -
VACATION Time; lost if not used
April 20th, 2013 -
Hire Date
April 20th, 2013 -
When are new applications required
April 20th, 2013 -
Employee pay reduction
April 20th, 2013 -
Arrested while at work
April 20th, 2013
Pages
